|  | |
|
|
|
| | |
|
 Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:04 pm |  |
I have ALWAYS used Roll vs. I do like the varying difficulty and I plan on using it more frequently. I just wish I knew how to gauge the difficulty for the situation better
| |
|
|
| |
| | |
|
| |
| | |
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:21 am | |
> roll vs dex ooc
OOC: You roll ooc vs. dex and pass with extraordinary ease.
<****** / ^^^^^^ / ||||||>
> roll vs str ooc
OOC: You roll ooc vs. str and pass with extraordinary ease.
<****** / ^^^^^^ / ||||||>
> roll vs wil ooc
OOC: You roll ooc vs. wil and pass with extraordinary ease.
<****** / ^^^^^^ / ||||||>
> roll vs con ooc
OOC: You roll ooc vs. con and pass with extraordinary ease.
Although fancying myself a god would nice....
| |
|
|
| |
| | |
|
| |
| | |
| | |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2013 2:56 am | |
The helpfile syntax is incorrect.
It's...
"roll vs (skill/stat) (difficulty - vhard/hard/medium/easy/veasy) (OOC if you want it public)"
Doing 'roll vs x ooc' has it treat OOC as the difficulty, which gives you an invisible auto-success.
Took me a few weeks of tinkering around to realize this myself.
| |
|
|
| |
| | |
|
| |
| | |
|
